This was also the only mailing list that I found a reference to when I was looking at the proton site. Which makes me agree that you (or at least the documentation) are trying to recruit developers rather than users. :-)
Troy On 3/24/16, 2:12 PM, "Michael Goulish" <mgoul...@redhat.com> wrote: > >I do think this list is meant to be mostly about the >mechanical details of development, and any topics >that would be of interest to actual users is meant to >go on the users list. > >The fact that there is no documentation that might >have told you this is actually intentional. It's to >help get you ready to read the proton code. :-) > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- >> Troy, >> >> I monitor both this discussion (proton) list and the users. >> >> It is true there is more going on in the users discussion list. I tend >>to >> post to the users list because a lot of times discussion items posted >>here >> (proton) are just not picked here as readily as on users. >> >> I agree with your general assessment. It does pose the question "When >>is it >> appropriate to post to this discussion list?" >> >> Paul Flores >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: Troy Daniels [troy.dani...@stresearch.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:02 AM >> To: proton@qpid.apache.org >> Subject: Does anyone read this list? >> >> It seems like there are two types of posts to this list: automated >>posts when >> there is an commit to version control, and initial questions from new >>users. >> There does not seem to be discussion or answers to questions. >> >> It seems like I should unsubscribe and find a different forum for my >> questions. Is that an accurate assessment? >> >> Troy
