Am 03.02.2007 um 19:37 schrieb Mislav Marohnić:
> Other DOM builders out there are script.aculo.us' [2], which is IMO > too big for core (what are those hacks for, anyway?); Mostly for browser bugs, many of which may have been fixed in newer browser versions. FF and IE both had very strange (and different) issues, iirc. See the unit tests for builder.js for more on this. Anyway, I'm not sure if we need a DOM Builder in Prototype core, though. I find myself using it for only a very few special occasions, as IMHO HTML is something the server should provide (as web dev frameworks should be good at generating HTML), and that's also one of the central things around Rails RJS templates. YMMV, but that approach allows for having to write less JavaScript. :) Best, Thomas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
