Andrew: that two features bring us back to Dan's or mine implementations and take out the lightweightness of Martin's elegant solution.
Martin: by all means, submit a patch with tests on the already existing ticket: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/7476#comment:1 Doing so will enable easy reviewing and comparing. -m On 2/6/07, Andrew Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Martin, I like your implementation a lot (especially the > Element.writeAttributes idea, which I think should be added no matter > what) but it's missing two things I like most about Dan Webb's > DOMBuilder: > > * Tags as method names. Much easier to do x.DIV(foo, bar) than to do > new Element("div", foo, bar). > * Easy nesting (like "x.DIV( x.P ( x.SPAN() ) )"). DOMBuilder > responds differently based on the number and types of arguments > passed. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
