On 14/02/2008, Richard Quadling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14/02/2008, Tobie Langel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > Thanks for the thumbs up. > > > > deprecation.js is meant to be used with prototype.js, not a subset of > > it, so I don't think that's really an issue for now. > > > > The plan is to keep this new prototype extension up to date with the > > changes in Prototype, so once we remove the Position object, we'll add > > it to deprecation.js. > > > Aha. Ok. I see. I was getting ahead of the game by taking out > Postition before its time. > > Thanks. > > > > On Feb 14, 11:02 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > If you comment out from prototype.js the deprecated functions/classes > > > (I take out the whole Position class for example), then deprecation.js > > > fails due to the lack of the namespace: Position. > > > > > > So, using v1.6.0.2, should Position be defined but unused and > > > therefore be in the global namespace or should it be commented out and > > > deprecation.js cope with its absence? > > > > > > (I can't quite decide if this is a core or a spinoff issue).
Would it be possible to add a version number/build number to the extension please. -- ----- Richard Quadling Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
