Please correct me if I get any quoting below wrong, it seems to have come through a bit confused.
[Steve Holden] > For Heaven's sake. We elect a board to look after these issues. You > can't expect to second-guess every deliberation. If you want to do > that, stand for the board. [Karl Karsten] > I have no idea what the individual board members think. Even when > there is a unanimous vote, I still don't know why they voted that > way. I too think it's legitimate for members to want to know not just the "what" but also the "why". [Steve Holden] > Because that's what they thought would be in the Foundation's best > interests. The PSF is a pretty big organization now. (Though I don't seem to be able to find a recent budget to see just how big. Is that a fault in my searching?) I think that members could have an interest in something more than belief in good intentions. The same good intentions can lead different people to different conclusions. I bet even Perl programmers have good intentions! Regards, Matt _______________________________________________ PSF-Community mailing list PSF-Community@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community
