LSH (was: status?)

[Werner Koch]

Niels M�ller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> would be interesting to know about the considerations that led to
> GMP-2.0 switching to LGPL. (lsh of course should be GPL:ed).

I remember that I have read a comment from the FSF (in a Bulletin?),
that the LGPL is to be considered a failed experiment.

Can some comment on this?


  Werner