> > > > Personally, if I were working on the code, I would want to check out a > > current copy, and then I would email you any patches by hand. So actually > > being able to use the client would be pretty important. > > I agree with Daniel. To me, http access would be a nice gimmick; regular CVS > access is the important thing. i agree as well. maybe i can provide the cvs space, so you don't have to install it on your computer (don't need to worry about security issues) --- Bazsi
- Re: lsh November 18 Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh November 18 J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
- Re: lsh November 18 Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh November 18 Daniel E. Eisenbud
- Re: lsh November 18 J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
- Re: lsh November 18 Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh November 18 Balazs Scheidler
- Re: lsh November 18 Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh November 18 Balazs Scheidler
- Re: lsh November 18 Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh November 18 Balazs Scheidler
- Re: lsh November 18 Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh November 18 Balazs Scheidler
- Re: lsh November 18 Niels M�ller
