if this is a general purpose machine as well as for PT use. I suggest lion as its miles ahead of SL in accessibility iMO. I really could use my mac day to day without annoyances till lion personally. And it would work well for mixing and etc as mine has slightly similar specs and works fine for mixing and etc. On Aug 28, 2012, at 7:56 PM, Scott Chesworth <scottcheswo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I have a Macbook Air here that I primarily use when I'm on the move. > Stupidly, I updated it to Mountain Lion, banking on a shaky theory > that if the move from SL to Lion didn't break accessibility, Lion to > ML probably wouldn't either. That's how well my theories work out! > > So, I'm going to roll back, only question is how far? I've not used PT > on this thing yet, but it's a Core I5 1.6 GHZ with 4GB RAM and the 128 > SSD, so I'm hoping it'll cope ok for editing and tweaking mixes. I've > been using GarageBand on it up until now, but as much as it's cool as > a scratch pad, we've started to fall out of love from a productivity > standpoint. > > The furthest I can roll back officially is to Lion, as that's what the > Air shipped with. HOwever, having done a bit of research, I reckon > I've collected up the necessary extra drivers and whatnot to get Snow > Leopard up and running. It'd be extra work, but by all accounts the > battery life last around an hour longer and the benchmarks look > marginally better running SL. > > Question is, has anybody noticed any differences that I should be > aware of between running PT in SL and Lion? My other machine where I > use PT is still on SL, so I haven't got any first hand experience of > PT in Lion yet. > > Any advice appreciated. > > Scott