This is a lot of wild conjecture, but assuming you're a fairly decent
player to begin with, I don't see any reason why it couldn't be done
productively if you can get your hands on a copy of Addictive 1. Sonar
still has the edge if you're into step sequencing as the like though.
Failing that, perhaps have a look into Strike to see if it sounds good
enough to get the job done. I noticed presets had been submitted to
the same place for that. Most of the time here I'm using EZ Drummer 2
these days for speed and ease, but I doubt it'd be accessible to the
PT plugin window. There is a demo on the Toontrack site though if you
fancy trying your luck with that.

Is there anybody here who does this stuff everyday in PT? I'm sure
there are aspects of the game that will have changed since I last did.

Scott

On 2/25/15, Steve Sparrow <i...@sparrowsound.com.au> wrote:
> Hey thanks for the run down. It puts me in the picture nicely.
> I guess the next question for me is,  do you have any suggestions as to
> where i go from here. do you know if drum programming can be done in pt, or
> is it back to sonar for this stuff. This is possible for me at the moment.
> But i would be interested to know if it can be done in p t, and what i'd
> need to  do the job. I'd also be interested to know if it cannot be done it
> p t at the present time, so i know where i am at.
> Steve
>
>> On 25 Feb 2015, at 11:25 pm, Scott Chesworth <scottcheswo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> I don't use Addictive in Pro Tools myself, but as I understand it in
>> the PT world, it is doable. There are a full set of presets on
>> protoolswithspeech.com that you'd need to grab. Beyond that, if
>> Addictive behaves the same way in PT as it does in my DAW, you'll have
>> the ability to tweak those presets using the automation parameters, of
>> which there are hundreds... almost too much control. Here's the rub
>> though. All of the above applies to Addictive version 1, which is
>> discontinued. Last time I looked at Addictive 2, it sounded great, but
>> what little accessibility they had in the form of the automation
>> parameters being clearly labeled was gone. The presets would also need
>> to be made all over again, which is no small job.
>>
>> Hth a bit
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On 2/25/15, Steve Sparrow <i...@sparrowsound.com.au> wrote:
>>> hey poppa.
>>> Ok well here's the go. I have to do some drum programming, and was
>>> wondering
>>> if this can be done in p t. If so, can you tell me how  i would do this,
>>> .
>>> Is there something in p t it self. or are there other applications i need
>>> to
>>> buy to allow me to do this. or will i need to use sonar  for midi work.
>>> I thought i read some posts on here saying  addictive drums was
>>> accessible.
>>> or am i getting it confused with something else.
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>> On 25 Feb 2015, at 6:24 pm, Poppa Bear <heavens4r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Steve, from what I understand addictive drums do not work as far
>>>> as
>>>> accessibility. There may be some work arounds, but none that I know of
>>>> as
>>>> yet. I think that PT is stepping up their accessibility on the midi
>>>> front,
>>>> but for me, I almost strictly use PT for recording paying clients and
>>>> my
>>>> relationship with clients is a strictly engineer based relationship and
>>>> I
>>>> do not offer any production services and it works out well so midi is
>>>> not
>>>> a bread and butter factor for me. I feel that when I dawn the producers
>>>> hat the relationship has the potential to go in a lot of unpredictable
>>>> directions.
>>>> Well, I am glad that it is working out for you and yes I also found the
>>>> learning curve steep, but at this point I am glad that I took the
>>>> plunge
>>>> and I am glad that so many before me put in all the work that they did
>>>> to
>>>> fight the battle to help get PT as accessible as it is.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
>>>> Behalf Of Steve Sparrow
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 6:01 PM
>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>>> Subject: Re: importing files
>>>>
>>>> i must admit, i have not ventured in to the midi world with p t as yet,
>>>> do
>>>> you see some issues ahead for me in this area.
>>>> I am thinking about investing in addictive drums for a start, I am
>>>> under
>>>> the impression that it is accessible. are there issues.
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>> On 23 Feb 2015, at 7:51 pm, Scott Chesworth <scottcheswo...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Wouldn't hold your breath for that just yet Poppa. It'd mean new
>>>>> hardware for them for starters, and that plus the cost of PT is quite
>>>>> a chunk of change for anyone. Plus, I think there's gonna need to
>>>>> either be more accessible softsynths or at least bolt-on solutions
>>>>> made with Keyboard Maestro that equal HSC in terms of reliability
>>>>> before a lot of screen reader users would consider making the switch
>>>>> and using PT in front of paying clients.
>>>>>
>>>>> We can live in hope though eh :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/23/15, Poppa Bear <heavens4r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> So Steve, are you feeling like you will stay with PT at this point? I
>>>>>> hope that some more people will come over from Sonar, especially
>>>>>> people like Chris Bell, Phil and others who have invested so much
>>>>>> time into digging up good work arounds, HSC sets, scripts and other
>>>>>> tools on the PC platform. I think that it would be a nice shot in the
>>>>>> arm for PT access.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
>>>>>> Behalf Of Steve Sparrow
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 4:04 PM
>>>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> Subject: Re: importing files
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it's working fine. No problem at all there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i guess this a dumb question and a big ask of p t. But is there any
>>>>>> way of importing all the files from a project in to a session in p t
>>>>>> in one operation, or will i need to import them one by one, track by
>>>>>> track. I assume the latter would be the case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23 Feb 2015, at 9:57 am, Chris Smart <csma...@cogeco.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yeah you should be able to bounce them all to individual files in
>>>>>>> bulk, in one operation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At 05:07 PM 2/22/2015, you wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hey slau thanks. iâ EURO (tm)ll have another look. i must admit, i
>>>>>>>> did not select all tracks before  consolidating, so maybe this is
>>>>>>>> the issue. Thanks again Steve
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 23 Feb 2015, at 7:58 am, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Steve,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't use Sonar but, as with any DAW on the market, You'll need
>>>>>>>>> to select all of your tracks from the start to the end and
>>>>>>>>> consolidate and then export. The other option, if the files are
>>>>>>>>> broadcast WAV, is to import to the original time stamp. This is
>>>>>>>>> more tedious so I'd go back to Sonar to get it right at the
>>>>>>>>> source.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Slau
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 22, 2015, at 3:53 PM, Steve Sparrow
>>>>>>>>> <i...@sparrowsound.com.au>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> just to add. when i exported out of sonar, i bounced clips to
>>>>>>>>>> track, and used the consolidate audio feature.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> only way i can see around this is to manually select each file in
>>>>>>>>>> sonar and mix them down one by one. then iâ EURO (tm)d have a
>>>>>>>>>> file at the correct length. But what a task. it would take for
>>>>>>>>>> ever. some of these old projects have 30 or 40 tracks in them.
>>>>>>>>>> If there are any other suggestions for getting some of these
>>>>>>>>>> files in to line,  iâ EURO (tm)d really appreciate the feed back.
>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23 Feb 2015, at 6:29 am, Steve Sparrow
>>>>>>>>>>> <i...@sparrowsound.com.au>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi. hereâ EURO (tm)s an interesting one.
>>>>>>>>>>> Iâ EURO (tm)ve started importing an older sonar project in to p
>>>>>>>>>>> t.
>>>>>>>>>>> Thiissue is, a lot of the files i have i did not start recording
>>>>>>>>>>> at the start of the project. for example, i have an organ track,
>>>>>>>>>>> which does not come in until the middle eight in the track. So
>>>>>>>>>>> when i recorded it in sonar ,  i just went to the part of the
>>>>>>>>>>> song i needed and started recording.
>>>>>>>>>>> so i have a shorter file that now does not line up when
>>>>>>>>>>> importing.
>>>>>>>>>>> The issue now is a lot of these files are like that. Some times
>>>>>>>>>>> there may be a very small part that needed to be played and we
>>>>>>>>>>> did not have time to site there listening to the whole track
>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>> to get there.
>>>>>>>>>>> So my question is this. Is there a way of alining these files up
>>>>>>>>>>> some how. How can i import them and get them all in there proper
>>>>>>>>>>> place. in p t.
>>>>>>>>>>> If this is not doable, then iâ EURO (tm)ll just have to go back
>>>>>>>>>>> to sonar to finish off any old projects. This i can do if need
>>>>>>>>>>> be. Just thought iâ EURO (tm)d ask if something can be done, as
>>>>>>>>>>> i have things set up nicely in p t now.
>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups
>>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an
>>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an
>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an
>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to