I blame auto correct here. It usually got my back, but this time it stabbed me 
in the back instead lol. Apologies man. 

> On Dec 10, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Scott Chesworth <scottcheswo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Replying to a few people's points all in one message:
> 
> Slau: aside from the extra levels of patronage (which I've seen over
> complicate some projects if not thoroughly thought through), crowd
> funding is the neatest way I know of getting paid a base rate that you
> can live with before pumping time into a project. Obviously some time
> has to go in to the crowd funding campaign itself, but I should think
> for most people, having to lay out the specifics of what they intend
> to create and committing to a timeline can only be a helpful thing
> once it comes to the actual recording. It's all too easy to run away
> with yourself sometimes isn't it.
> 
> Carlos: While the PT With Speech stuff is well done, there's not a ton
> of content in there to appeal to the more advanced users IMO, and I'm
> pretty sure that Slau will want to go a little deeper. Worth noting
> that that's not to say that Matt and Rob don't know their stuff, far
> from it. Also, so far as I know, those tutorials haven't been updated
> to include the most recent accessibility changes yet. Some of them are
> biggies. Like, every time you work you notice them type biggies.
> 
> Oreo: you think Scott makes valid points and you agree with *her*?
> That's good to know old chap. Now, shall we set aside some time to
> have a talk about boys and girls and how to tell the difference? :P
> 
> Scott (boy edition, who is yet to encounter a girl edition)
> 
> On 12/10/15, Ricky Prevatte <rickypreva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I would go no lower than 100 you are busy and you cannot afford to do any
>> less. You could make more money doing a studio project. I would enjoy that
>> but the groove three model as I said before would be a good thing.
>> 
>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
>> 
>>> On Dec 8, 2015, at 7:08 AM, david <dingram...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Now there we’re at pt 12.3 I think that a lot of things have improved
>>> since pt 8 or pt9 in terms of voice over accessibility and what you’re
>>> able to do now. I would say about $100 for a five part series concerning
>>> specific things concerning pro tools.  The problems that I had while I was
>>> in school were that recording midi was a chore and you didn’t have
>>> accessibility and the adjusting of tempo was something that was a problem
>>> but I don’t know how much things have gotten.  Someone else would have to
>>> speak to these issues.  Just something to think about
>>> 
>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
>>> Behalf Of Ricky Prevatte
>>> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 9:01 PM
>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: what would you pay for a comprehensive Pro Tools tutorial?
>>> 
>>> Definitely the groove three model would be a good guideline. I would
>>> support it and be glad to do so.
>>> 
>>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
>>> 
>>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Nickus de Vos <bigboy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Slau
>>> Mmmmm do I smell something brewing at BeSharp?
>>> I think a great guideline to look at when putting something like this
>>> together is the Groove3 model, both in terms of pricing and chapter
>>> lengths.
>>> 
>>> If chapters are too long it can be a mission to navigate them, especially
>>> if you are going back later looking for a specific bit. As for pricing,
>>> someone else already mentioned this will be sold to a much smaller
>>> audience and you would want to be paid for your time, but I think if going
>>> too expensive it won’t sell too well.
>>> For example I’ll pay $50 for a tutorial series on a specific topic, but if
>>> that same series costs $200 then I’ll rather spend the $200 on a new
>>> plug-in and figure it out myself. Not saying it must be $50 and $200 will
>>> be crazy, but I think you get the idea, you can only charge so much for a
>>> online tutorial.
>>> 
>>> Nickus
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On 07 Dec 2015, at 17:21, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm just doing a bit of market research here:
>>> I'm curious to know what the list feels is a minimum price they'd expect a
>>> comprehensive tutorial on using Pro Tools with VoiceOver to cost and what
>>> would be the maximum they'd consider paying for such a series.
>>> I'm not talking about a replacement for the Pro Tools manuals but rather a
>>> series of modules that cover the VoiceOver specific techniques of using
>>> Pro Tools. I know this is still pretty vague but I also wonder what kind
>>> of scale people would expect: a 5-hour series? A ten-part series of
>>> one-hour segments?One or two main parts with smaller modules for more
>>> specific subjects?
>>> Anyway, I might have an idea for such an undertaking but feeling the water
>>> first. Please share any relevant thoughts.
>>> 
>>> Slau
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to