The steps Christopheroutlined should work. As I stated in an earlier email, Starting in Pro Tools 9 I think it was you could just add an AUX track to the project and then route your Audio/Midi tracks to the aux track with out having to mess with buss routings anymore.
The edit/mix group idea however would not be appropriate in this case. > On Nov 2, 2019, at 9:45 AM, Christopher Gilland <clgillan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I see the entire problem. > > > You're routing is a bit off. > > > Try this. > > > 1. Create your Connection audio track. > > > 2. Create your radio FX audio track. > > > 3. On your Connections track, interact with sends A/F. > > > 4. On Send A, VO+Space on the top up, and go down to new track. Be careful > here. Not the track sub menu. It's below that. It will literally say "New > Track". This will force ProTools to create the AUX track for you, with all > routing set correctly. > > > 5. Now, go to your Radio FX track. We're almost going to do the same thing > here, but not quite. You now have already set an AUX track, so interact again > with sends A/F, only this time, again, now, we're on the radio FX track, not > the connectionstrack. > > > 6. On Send A of the Radio FX track, go into the popup for send A. This time, > instead of going to new track, go to the tracks sub menu, then find the AUX > track you created in the previous steps. Now, things should be routed. > > > 7. Now, go rename the AUX track to something more recognizable: "Group FX" > > > 8. Finally, go to the AUX track, and interact with inserts, not sends, but > inserts, A-F. On insert A, instantiate your reverb. We're doing this on the > AUX track, not your two audio tracks. Beware. > > > There. Now play it back. You should definitely hear the reverb, if you did > this correctly. > > > On another note for the list entirely, given that he's naming that 3rd track, > "Group FX" it sounds like he's just trying to group both the audio tracks > into one, so he can instantiate reverb across both at the same time. I could > be wrong, so Danny, let us know if I'm incorrect on this theory. > > > If that is the case, would it not be easier for him to create an edit/mix > group, then assign both of those audio tracks to that group, then just apply > the reverb to the group? The only thing I could think that may not work for > that method is the fact, if he does it as an edit/mix group, wouldn't that > mean he'd destructively have to print the verb directly to the track with > something like audiosuite? If so, then, yeah, definitely not probably what > he's looking for. I just thought however I'd mention. > > > Chris. > > On 11/02/2019 01:14 AM, Dammie Onafeko wrote: >> Hi guys: >> >> I did what yo'll told me to do and I can't still hear the reverb. This >> is what I have: >> a track Connection, another called Radio Effect, and the Aux called Group >> Verb. >> I routed sends oA of Connections and Radio Effect to Group Verb. >> Then I go into sends A of Group Verb, VO space on it to open the menu, >> and went down to bus 3, 4. >> I did same thing for Connections and Radio Effect. >> While in the sends menu, I went to the level fader and took it to -15 >> I don't how to control the dryness and wetness. >> When I play the audio back, I couldn't hear the reverb effect. What am >> I still doing wrong? Somebody help! >> >> Best, >> >> Dammie >> >> On 11/1/19, TheOreoMonster <monkeypushe...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> When you use a send, you ae sending a copy of the audio signal So in essence >>> you are creating a wet/dry blend. This is useful for things like reverb and >>> delays or other time based effects. When you put the reverb or delay on the >>> aux track, you will want to set it to be 100% wet. Then the send level will >>> act as the wet dry balance. Since the original audio track’s output is still >>> going to the master fader, and the AUX’s output is also going to the master >>> fader, the send level will set how much of that dry signal” gets pushed into >>> the reverb and as a result how much reverb’ed signal shows up in the master >>> fader. >>> Chaning the output of the track to the AUX or bus, means you are sending all >>> the tracks signal to a bus and not a duplicate of it as you would be if you >>> use a send. A useful example for this use case is lets say you have 5 vocal >>> tracks. You can set the output of those 5 tracks to a AUX or bus, and now >>> you can just EQ and compress all your vocals and use that AUX/Bus fader as a >>> master fader for the vocals. But since the AUX/bus is still being sent to >>> the master fader you still get the vocals in the mix. >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 1, 2019, at 4:53 PM, Christopher Gilland <clgillan...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> So, what is the difference in using a send on an audio track, sending to >>>> an AUX track, then letting PT do the routing, vs. setting your output IO >>>> of an audio track to a bus, then going to an AUX track, and setting the >>>> input to that same bus, and leaving, on the AUX track, your output IO set >>>> to your main out L/R? >>>> >>>> >>>> IN other words, what I'm asking is, what's the difference in doing this >>>> with a send, vs doing it via your IO paths without a send involved? >>>> >>>> >>>> I've seen it done both ways. I know there is a key major difference, and a >>>> reason why you'd do the ladder, but I just can't seem to grasp why? >>>> >>>> >>>> Chris. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/4f5216dd-0016-a2c2-501e-33750b22bcb4%40gmail.com. >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/4B1161A7-A4A8-4DC8-9C1A-2894D82AF1AA%40gmail.com. >>> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/7acabda4-e8ef-7620-6a40-205726360904%40gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/2EE1BC7F-8186-4CD2-809C-A491C7E2AC63%40gmail.com.
