On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 20:21 +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: > > Anybody else have this problem with ipkg-push? > > Am I missing something to tell my native python to look for additional > > site-packages in local-host dir? > > Or, something to tell ipkg-make-index to run the local-host version of > > python instead of the native one? > > Hmm, I must admit that I have no idea what ipkg-push does exactly :-/ > > If nobody jumps in, I'll put it on the todo list. Note also that ipkg is > relatively broken in general - since the last version update (necessary > due to other problems) the 'ipkg remove <bla>' - 'ipkg install bla.ipk' > cycle doesn't work any more. It's also on the todo list. > > As we chronically have too less customers who care for maintenance > issues (founding maintenance is boring, but surely everybody wants to > have a working ptxdist for free), such things have to wait until we > either have nothing else to do, if it itches in one of our commercial > projects or if somebody from the community helps out. > > Robert
Thanks for the quick reply...even though not quite the reply I was hoping for! I'll treat this as a broken package and assume whatever weird or broken behavior is just the way it is for now. The package update and installed package listing does indeed seem broken, but I've had some success with getting the ipkg install command to install s/w updates on my target system, so I think it might still offer some value to me. I'll only be able to spend as much time on it as is necessary for meeting the requirements of my project, but I'll post if I do anything that might be useful. Thanks again! --Randall -- |\/| |/\| |\/| Randall S. Loomis Sr. Software Engineer Solectek Corporation www.solectek.com -- ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
