Ah, I see. Well, you'd have to ask Mozilla and/or Google for that kind of information I'd say.
Mark. -- Mark Baker Manager, Standards Research in Motion Ltd. (M) +1.613.301.5470 ----- Original Message ----- From: Mikko Pohja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Sat Jul 29 10:40:18 2006 Subject: Re: Comments and questions on XBL2 Working Draft Mark Baker wrote: > > On 7/28/06, Mikko Pohja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> In general, it would be useful if there were available use cases >> and/or requirements for XBL. One could easier evaluate the language and >> understand reasoning for certain features. Is there any document which >> can be published? > > We are working on an XBL requirements document. AFAIK, the latest > public version is here; > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Feb/att-0000/XBL-UCs-and-Reqs-2006-02-10-DRAFT.html Yes, I know. However, the XBL spec is not directly derived from that document but is based on Mozilla's work. Basically, I'm just interested in reasoning behind certain features and design decisions. Mikko --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
