On Aug 03, 2006, at 23:41, Ian Hickson wrote:
It has come to my attention that not everybody thought that the xml:id discussion was resovled. To recap, the conclusion was that xml:id can be used with XBL2 if desired, and that in addition, a simple "id" attribute is to be included for consistency with HTML. If this doesn't cater for your use case, please don't hesitate to reply to this e-mail explaining your use case and how this solution does not satisfy it.
I don't think that this solution exemplifies good, quality design and I've already made my objections and use cases clear, but in the interest of not wasting my vacation time talking with someone incapable of cool-headed discussions using arguments grounded in reality rather than theology, or for that matter basic respect for others and their opinions, I don't see the point of discussing it further.
-- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/
