* Ian Hickson wrote: >It has come to my attention that not everybody thought that the xml:id >discussion was resovled. To recap, the conclusion was that xml:id can >be used with XBL2 if desired, and that in addition, a simple "id" >attribute is to be included for consistency with HTML.
I understand from: If the URI contains a fragment identifier, it must point to a specific binding element (by id) within an XBL subtree in the specified document, and that element must be a direct child of an xbl element that does not itself have an xbl element as an ancestor; if these conditions are not met then the URI is in error. that authors cannot use xml:id instead of the id attribute. If they should be able to use xml:id instead, the reference to "by id" above is misleading. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
