Dear XBL experts,
This email comments on the 7 September 2006 LCWD of XBL 2.0.
In Section 4.7 "Binding inheritance", is this correct to say that a
"base binding of the chain" is a "base binding" if the chain of binding
is the first one attached to the element.
In other words, in the example, there is no base binding, because the
base binding of the chains are 'c', 'c', 'd' and 'g' but 'g' implicitely
inherits from 'd', 'd' from 'c' and 'c' from 'a'.
In this example, 'e' is the most derived binding, correct ?
Please explain the terms also using the example.
Cyril Concolato
