On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:39:04 +0200, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My .02; I'm not too worried about saving bytes (at least on this scale), but I do wonder if that "Content" prefix is justified...
Hmm, I can find me suggesting the name Content-Access-Control as far back as 200605 but I'm pretty sure someone else suggested it to me first. I'm thinking it was Mark Baker, but I can't find the relevant minutes/e-mail.
(Personally I'd be fine with naming it Access-Control.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
