On 7/30/07, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:39:04 +0200, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > My .02; I'm not too worried about saving bytes (at least on this scale), > > but I do wonder if that "Content" prefix is justified... > > Hmm, I can find me suggesting the name Content-Access-Control as far back > as 200605 but I'm pretty sure someone else suggested it to me first. I'm > thinking it was Mark Baker, but I can't find the relevant minutes/e-mail. > > (Personally I'd be fine with naming it Access-Control.)
I don't think I would have suggested that name. The Content-* headers are defined to be entity headers, whereas Access-Control would presumably be a response header. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
