On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:43:51 +0100, Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Art, correct me if I'm wrong -- but I believe the conclusion of that
discussion was *not* that OPTIONS is deemed rejected, but rather,
that the group is seeking input from the HTTP community on what
design to use?
http://www.w3.org/2007/11/05-waf-minutes#item09
AFAICT OPTIONS is rejected until there's evidence that it can be used.
Requesting feedback from the HTTP WG on this has been done, though so far
the HTTP WG has not replied in any official manner.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
