That's not how the IETF works. Working groups as a whole can't
formally review external documents; however, interested individuals
can come and give expert feedback (which I think has happened here).
There's also a formal liaison between W3C and IETF that can be used;
pursuing that path would likely end up with an expert (or experts)
being nominated to provide feedback.
On 09/01/2008, at 10:54 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:43:51 +0100, Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Art, correct me if I'm wrong -- but I believe the conclusion of that
discussion was *not* that OPTIONS is deemed rejected, but rather,
that the group is seeking input from the HTTP community on what
design to use?
http://www.w3.org/2007/11/05-waf-minutes#item09
AFAICT OPTIONS is rejected until there's evidence that it can be
used. Requesting feedback from the HTTP WG on this has been done,
though so far the HTTP WG has not replied in any official manner.
--
Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
