On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:42:03 +0100, David Orchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, what I meant was that I don't know what down to earth means in this context, namely for writing a spec. Down to earth applied to a policy language specification is absurd. We need a language that is unambigous and clear to get to interoperable implementations.
Agreed. Your comments on where the current specification does not meet that goal are much appreciated.
-- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
