On 2007-12-04 14:17:01 +1000, Marcos Caceres wrote: > I guess one thing we don't need to worry about at the moment is > concerning ourselves with the widget.system() API, as we > currently don't spec it ( should we?:) )....
Given the commonality of widget.system like APIs, I wonder if it wouldn't be useful to actually spec something -- and not widget.system, but an API along the lines of execve() on Unix. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
