public-appformats  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Thomas Roessler
  • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jonas Sicking
  • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jonas Sicking
  • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jonas Sicking
  • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Arthur Barstow
  • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Anne van Kesteren
• <form> POST versus Access Control POST Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: <form> POST versus Access Control POST Jonas Sicking
  • Re: <form> POST versus Access Control POST Mark Baker
  • Re: <form> POST versus Access Control POST Ian Hickson
  • Re: <form> POST versus Access Control POST Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: <form> POST versus Access Control POST Thomas Roessler
• [waf] Access Control Issue 19: Requirements document updated dated 20080114 David Orchard
• ISSUE-21: What is the Security Model for the access-control spec? [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
• Minutes from WAF WG's 9 January 2008 meeting Arthur Barstow
• Re: OPTIONS and Method-Check Ian Hickson
  • Fwd: OPTIONS and Method-Check Arthur Barstow
• Comments on requirements document Thomas Roessler
• RE: [waf] Draft of merged Web Apps WG charter available David Orchard
  • Re: [waf] Draft of merged Web Apps WG charter available Arthur Barstow
  • RE: [waf] Draft of merged Web Apps WG charter available David Orchard
• Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Ian Hickson
  • RE: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) David Orchard
  • [access-control] Requirements, UCs and design rationale [Was: Subject: Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) ] Arthur Barstow
  • Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Mark Nottingham
  • Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Brad Porter
  • Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Anne van Kesteren
• Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Brad Porter
  • Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Ian Hickson
  • Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Ian Hickson
  • Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Brad Porter
  • Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Brad Porter
• Re: Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Brad Porter
  • Re: Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Brad Porter
  • Re: Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Jon Ferraiolo
• [no subject] Brad Porter
  • Re: Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Brad Porter
• ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Mark Nottingham
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Arthur Barstow
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard
  • RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Brad Porter
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Arthur Barstow
  • RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
  • RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard
  • RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Thomas Roessler
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Arthur Barstow
  • RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard
• Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
• Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Thomas Roessler
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Mark Nottingham
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Arthur Barstow
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Jonas Sicking
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Emmanouil Batsis (Manos)
• ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
  • Re: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] David Orchard
  • RE: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] David Orchard
  • Re: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
• ISSUE-19: What are the Requirements, Design Principles and Use Cases? [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
  • GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS David Orchard
  • Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Arthur Barstow
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Thomas Roessler
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jonas Sicking
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jonas Sicking
  • Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
  • RE: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Close, Tyler J.
• Fw: Another XBL 'player' Cameron McCormack
• [widgets] Open Ajax Alliance Marcos Caceres
  • Re: [widgets] Open Ajax Alliance José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
  • Re: [widgets] Open Ajax Alliance Jon Ferraiolo
• Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Igor Netto
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests David Orchard
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jon Ferraiolo
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests T.V Raman
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests John Panzer
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests John Panzer
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Arthur Barstow
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
  • GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
  • Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
  • Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Jonas Sicking
  • Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren
  • Fwd: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Arthur Barstow
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Douglas Crockford
  • Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ric Johnson
• [XBL2] An implementation and tests Mikko Pohja
• comments on access control for cross-site requests - WSC member Doyle, Bill
  • Re: comments on access control for cross-site requests - WSC member Jonas Sicking
  • RE: comments on access control for cross-site requests - WSC member Doyle, Bill
  • RE: comments on access control for cross-site requests - WSC member Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: comments on access control for cross-site requests - WSC member Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: comments on access control for cross-site requests - WSC member Doyle, Bill
  • Re: comments on access control for cross-site requests - WSC member Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: comments on access control for cross-site requests - WSC member Jonas Sicking
  • Re: comments on access control for cross-site requests - WSC member Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: comments on access control for cross-site requests - WSC member Jonas Sicking
• FW: [waf] Agenda for 2007-12-05 Voice Conf Tex Texin
  • Re: FW: [waf] Agenda for 2007-12-05 Voice Conf Marcos Caceres
• [waf] New Charter proposal Arthur Barstow

• Earlier messages
• Later messages