Kingsley Idehen wrote: > Nathan wrote: >> Perhaps I'm missing something, but the primary focus for me is to use >> ontologies that people will be using in SPARQL (or alternative language) >> queries. Anything else appears to be a waste of time. >> >> Multiple properties in multiple languages that appear to describe the >> same thing make no logical sense to me whatsoever, and questioning my >> own programming capabilities here, I don't see how they will to a >> machine either. >> > Ah! Now your going to the next stage, and this is where UMBEL [1] gets > interesting :-) It provides you with a framework meshing > ontologies to reflect your particular world view i.e., you can use UMBEL > (as is), or your adaptation (i.e. you additional mappings) as an > inference rules context. > > 1. http://umbel.org >
thanks again kingsley :)