I think this is great, but I am wondering if there should be some way of differentiating between the original endpoint and third-party endpoints.
The GeoSpecies/TaxonConcept endpoint is the same, but there are other third-party endpoints. I don't understand why the statistics for the GeoSpecies/TaxonConcept original endpoints are different since they are the same site. Thanks, - Pete On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche < py.vandenbuss...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > you have already encountered problems of SPARQL endpoint accessibility ? > you feel frustrated they are never available when you need them? > you develop an application using these services but wonder if it is > reliable? > > Here is a tool <http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/index.html>[1] > that allows you to know public SPARQL endpoints availability > and monitor them in the last hours/days. > Stay informed of a particular (or all) endpoint status changes through RSS > feeds. > All availability information generated by this tool is accessible through a > SPARQL > endpoint. > > This tool fetches public SPARQL endpoints from CKAN <http://ckan.net/> open > data. From this list, it runs tests every hour for availability. > > [1] http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/index.html > <http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/index.html>[2] > http://ckan.net/ > > Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche. > -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Pete DeVries Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin - Madison 445 Russell Laboratories 1630 Linden Drive Madison, WI 53706 TaxonConcept Knowledge Base <http://www.taxonconcept.org/> / GeoSpecies Knowledge Base <http://lod.geospecies.org/> About the GeoSpecies Knowledge Base <http://about.geospecies.org/> ------------------------------------------------------------