Ian, On 1 Apr 2011, at 13:42, Ian Davis wrote: > I really don't see why I should have to reengineer my entire toolchain simply > to consume your proprietary format. It is well known that the standard for > information interchange is the Microsoft Word 97 document format which is > easily read by every popular computing package.
M$ Word readily available? You're clearly not living in the real world and are trying to push an overly complicated solution. There is a far superior, more interoperable, and more widely supported standard that would make an infinitely better replacement for RDF: RTF. Best, Richard
