Yes, RTF will be much better than Word - I will only need to change a D to a T.
----- Reply message ----- From: "Richard Cyganiak" <rich...@cyganiak.de> To: "Ian Davis" <m...@iandavis.com> Cc: "Christopher Gutteridge" <c...@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "<public-lod@w3.org>" <public-lod@w3.org> Subject: Exciting changes at Data.Southampton.ac.uk! Date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 09:31 Ian, On 1 Apr 2011, at 13:42, Ian Davis wrote: > I really don't see why I should have to reengineer my entire toolchain simply > to consume your proprietary format. It is well known that the standard for > information interchange is the Microsoft Word 97 document format which is > easily read by every popular computing package. M$ Word readily available? You're clearly not living in the real world and are trying to push an overly complicated solution. There is a far superior, more interoperable, and more widely supported standard that would make an infinitely better replacement for RDF: RTF. Best, Richard
