On 10/18/11 7:54 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote:
Can someone remind me why people are using 303 at all, as opposed to hash URIs in the #_ or #it pattern?I've been trying to make a compelling case for 303 over hash, without much success. What would be most valuable is war stories, especially ones that answer questions that have been left unanswered in the previous thread http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Sep/0003.html and in the writeup http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/issue57/latest/#hash Thanks Jonathan
I think that had a lot to do with IE and the desire to boostrap Linked Data in a manner that worked across all browsers.
Links:1. http://jamespreston.co.uk/Articles/RedirectingIE6ToUrlWithFragmentIdentifier.html -- here is a 2007 post about the problem
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
