what is this IE6 that you talk about ?
:)
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Kingsley Idehen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/18/11 1:49 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote:
>>
>> I'm not trying to be difficult, I just really don't get what you're
>> saying.
>>
>>> > I believe the your quests was about a case for 303's. Which is
>>> > basically
>>> > another way of seeking a case for slash terminated URIs re. Linked
>>> > Data
>>> > deployment.
>>
>> Not exactly - I'm trying to build a case against hash URIs.
>
> A case against hash URIs is that your deployment won't play well with IE 6.
> The problem with IE 6 is that it sends # over the wire. Other browsers
> don't. Thus, you (the publisher) has extra work on your hands should you
> want your Linked Data deployment to cater to IE 6 users. This is why DBpedia
> opted to use slash URIs since that meant a single set of re-write rules
> without any exception oriented heuristics for IE 6 user agents.
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen
> President& CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
