We, as content creators, are holding all the cards. This is worth bearing in 
mind when one has to deal with demands of e.g. "specialist" book editors - the 
publisher needs the content creator to survive, but the inverse is not so true 
these days.

-- 
Leon R A Derczynski
Research Associate, NLP Group

Department of Computer Science
University of Sheffield
Regent Court, 211 Portobello
Sheffield S1 4DP, UK

+45 5157 4948
http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~leon/

I agree, with the proviso that creation can not be dissociated from content, 
but economic survival is optional*.
So, +1, by which I mean (approx.)
<plus>
   <rdf:first>1*exp(ln(6 + (28/100))</rdf:first>
   <rdf:rest><rdf:nill /></rdf:rest>
</plus>

[*]
 (Keppler's 2nd Law: A line joining a planet and the Sun sweeps out 
equal areas during equal intervals of time.) is not the same thing as " 
... sweeps out equal areas during *consecutive* intervals of time.
--Gannon  

Reply via email to