On 11/22/13 3:10 PM, mike amundsen wrote:
Are words such as "enables" , "facilitates" etc.. so bad that we can no longer make statements like:sigh... copying to the list this time.On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:10 PM, mike amundsen <mam...@yahoo.com <mailto:mam...@yahoo.com>> wrote:yep. In past writing/speaking I've drawn a line from James Gibson through Donald Norman and up to Roy Fielding[1] [1] http://amundsen.com/blog/archives/1109
<a/> enables name to address indirection in HTML via URIs? Basically, that it enables exploitation URI serve dually as a document name and a content access address i.e., a hyperlink.
Would REST be less useful if the word "affordance" wasn't engrained in its narrative?
[1] http://bit.ly/15tk1Au -- hash based URIs that denote things unambiguously while also making full use of HTTP URI duality [2] http://bit.ly/17RQQXX -- name resolution, data source names, and networks.
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
