Shelley Powers wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@opera.com <mailto:ann...@opera.com>> wrote:On Thu, 28 May 2009 15:18:11 +0200, Shelley Powers <shelley.j...@gmail.com <mailto:shelley.j...@gmail.com>> wrote: > In fact, that's my biggest concern: that discussions should occur > directly between RDFa and HTML5 folks are not happening, happening offline, or > snarkily, in IRC ( > http://lastweekinhtml5.blogspot.com/2009/05/rdfa-guys-wake-up-and-smell-pilgrims.html). What do you mean? At least Sam Ruby and Philip Taylor are debating the technical issues with the RDFa crowd right on this mailing list.I meant exactly what I said: it would have been helpful to have folks who have implemented RDFa libraries in JS participating, because they will have the best understanding of the issues. That's not a condemnation of the folks, just an observation that the discussion isn't as inclusive as it need be.
The most I can do is make *this* place hospitable. If there are issues that are preventing others from participating here, I ask that Chris and I be informed as to what these issues (either on-list or off-list) are and I am committed to resolving them.
I hope that the folks that have implemented RDFa libraries in JS do chose to participate when they are ready.
- Sam Ruby
