On 8/19/2013 9:23 PM, Mhyst wrote:
He was trying to brief me the whole thing... which I appreciate.
The basic thing is like he said, isn't it?
Now if I ask you, Jeff, how much money do they pay (the interested
companies, obviously) you for allowing this nonsense... would you
consider offensive as well?
Certainly, that question is at least uninformed.
Members of W3C pay according to a well defined schedule which gives them
full Membership privileges. No extra money has been paid for anything
related to EME.
W3C Director, Tim Berners-Lee decides on the scope of Working Groups. I
find it pretty offensive that someone would suggest that he makes these
decisions based on money paid. His decision to make the web open;
rather than used for his proprietary advantage certainly disproves your
theory.
Well, I don't pretend to insult you. Not at all. I just try to
understand how things went this way. That's all.
In my opinion, there should be a previous consensus before starting to
consider the best way to implement (define) EME.
I'm here just two days and I don't see that so called consensus about
the matter. So why are we supposed to talk about the better approaches
to define EME?
