I wouldn't hace ever dreamed about stating that sentence, but today one may never know. Anyway, a I retire it. El 20/08/2013 03:29, "Jeff Jaffe" <[email protected]> escribió:
> On 8/19/2013 9:23 PM, Mhyst wrote: > >> He was trying to brief me the whole thing... which I appreciate. >> The basic thing is like he said, isn't it? >> >> Now if I ask you, Jeff, how much money do they pay (the interested >> companies, obviously) you for allowing this nonsense... would you >> consider offensive as well? >> > > Certainly, that question is at least uninformed. > > Members of W3C pay according to a well defined schedule which gives them > full Membership privileges. No extra money has been paid for anything > related to EME. > > W3C Director, Tim Berners-Lee decides on the scope of Working Groups. I > find it pretty offensive that someone would suggest that he makes these > decisions based on money paid. His decision to make the web open; rather > than used for his proprietary advantage certainly disproves your theory. > > >> Well, I don't pretend to insult you. Not at all. I just try to >> understand how things went this way. That's all. >> >> In my opinion, there should be a previous consensus before starting to >> consider the best way to implement (define) EME. >> I'm here just two days and I don't see that so called consensus about >> the matter. So why are we supposed to talk about the better approaches >> to define EME? >> >> >
