Oops, I was a couple of posts out in the first link, should be a little less baffling with this one:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2006Jul/0139.html (thanks Henry!) On 7/24/06, Danny Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems to be a little thread convergence going on. Gmail doesn't seem to allow in-reply-to on two posts, so instead: Re: BioRDF: URI Best Practices http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2006Jul/0141.html Re: expectations of vocabulary http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2006Jul/0068.html [I've at least one ulterior motive in wanting to see this discussion evolve further. When I get time I want to play with the idea of "semantic cookies" - put the URI of the agent-user's FOAF profile in a Link: header, server adjusts response appropriately] Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
-- http://dannyayers.com
