Matthias, These points wrt LS URIs resonate quite well with me... Continuing on with this reasoning, it would appear the only difference URI resolution offers (for pure RDF data only) is getting back a set of RDF statements from the URI authority. This does not represent all the existing RDF triples on the URI, but only those the authority has compiled, curated, versioned, and published. Since the authority is embedded in the LSID structure, the LSIDS offer a hook to finding out "who" has the authoritative curated source on this URI, and therefore that a resolvable chunk of RDF does exist at that authority. Perhaps just a call to the authority (via a special request URL) to check for resolvability (in the LSID case) is simply what is needed. For all the other RDF statements around a URI not owned by any authority, we will eventually need the equivalent of a URI-to-statement indexing system on the scale of google, but serving a very broad life science and medicine community... -- vendors, any takers ? ; ) see you in a few days... Eric
|
- Re: BioRDF: URL Statements Susie Stephens
- Re: BioRDF: URL Statements Phillip Lord
- RE: BioRDF: URL Statements Xiaoshu Wang
- Re: BioRDF: URL Statements Susie Stephens
- Re: BioRDF: URL Statements Matthias Samwald
- RE: BioRDF: URL Statements Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
- Re: BioRDF: URL Statements Eric Neumann