I have proposed something related to this for OBI, for capturing the
sources of definitions. A description can be found at
http://esw.w3.org/topic/OBI_Definition_Source. I added a link to your
page.
Comments/questions welcome,
-Alan
On Apr 6, 2007, at 12:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many of the Semantic Web ontologies in the domain of HCLS contain
constructs for the representation of bibliographic information and
references to database entries. Unfortunately, it seems that most
of them came up with their own solutions.
If we as Semantic Web developers want to be taken seriously in our
striving for improved interoperability, we should try to find a
common solution. Of course, we can do mappings between our
ontologies, but it would definitly be preferable to use the same
set of constructs from the start. As most of our ontologies are
under development, we still have the opportunity to reach an
agreement.
I have started a wiki page that lists HCLS ontologies that contain
constructs for the representation of bibliographic information, as
well as possible standards that could be re-used to increase
interoperability:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/HCLSIG_BibliographicInformation
I am sure that the list is incomplete, so please take the time to
add to it. What are your thoughts about this problem?
cheers,
Matthias Samwald
.
--
"Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail