I hate to see the number of wikis used for this purpose multiply. There's already some discussion in the ESW wiki, e.g. http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices and http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices/Work_Plan, and in the neurocommons wiki, http://wiki.neurocommons.org/CommonNaming.
Are you avoiding the ESW wiki because it's so slow? That was one of my reasons for using the neurocommons wiki for this job; I've regularly been seeing up to 60 seconds for basic operations such as 'edit' and 'save'. Eric P is looking into this. If it can't be fixed, I think we'll have to choose a different location. As for a "base of discussion", I think we already have too many of those. The trick is to relate new writings to old ones, or to update old ones to make them better, and that's what we need a wiki for. Before I comment on your "manifesto", may I ask if you have any comments on the URI practices work plan for which I requested feedback? Or is it your preference to set up a parallel effort? Jonathan On 6/19/07, Marc-Alexandre Nolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, About this Banff Manifesto, me and Francois Belleau wanted to give a base of discussion with this text. The purpose of it, is to give some simple rule where, when you followed them, URI will connect together without having the added work to rewrite every URI before using them. For everybody to be able to place comment on it, the last version is in a wiki at http://bio2rdf.org/JSPWiki/Wiki.jsp?page=BanffManifesto In this same wiki, we are currently making a follow up of the article we present in Banff and explaining every normalization and decision we took about URI for our system to work. We welcome every comments. Marc-Alexandre Nolin 2007/6/18, Kei Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Jonathan et al., > > Eric may add to it, but I just want to describe briefly what I know. At > the Banff HCLS-DI Workshop > (http://neuroweb.med.yale.edu/hcls/Welcome.htm), a number of authors had > presented their work involving their own URI convention/format. As a > result, there was a proposal called "Banff Manifesto" > (http://docs.google.com/View?docid=ddm4nhwq_41cpz6kq). There was a > follow-up meeting at Banff right after the HCLS demo that Eric and > others might be able to tell people more about it (I wasn't at the > follow-up meeting). > > Best, > > -Kei > > Jonathan Rees wrote: > > > > > > On 6/11/07, *Eric Neumann* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > +1 ! > > > > I've also added a reference to the Banff discussion on URI's. I > > plan to put this also on the agenda for the next HCLSIG TC (June 21). > > > > -Eric > > > > > > > > Thanks, but for the benefit of those of us who weren't at this > > dicussion in Banff, could you summarize what transpired, or give a > > link to minutes? > > > > > >
