Mark Wilkinson wrote:

"A user who places the identifier in the location bar of a web browser should get back useful information about the identified concept or object."

Why? It seems an awfully steep barrier-to-entry to have *all* URI's resolve to a web page as well as to whatever the URI actually represents, especially when my agent can't read...
Well, first, if a URI is not resolved something, the purpose of using web is lost. Second, a URI is not resolved to a "web page," rather it is resolved to a representation, which can happen to be an HTML document (a web page, I guess) of the resource that the URI denotes. Third, an agent may not read "natural language" but should be able to read "something", such as XML or RDF or even a binary file, yes? This is what Jonathan's document intends to say - "useful information".

Xiaoshu

Mark




On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:01:17 -0700, Eric Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

* Jonathan Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-25 13:08-0400]

I've been posting revisions to the URI note to the same location:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/notes/uris/

If you're planning on attending the next HCLS meeting/telecon (Monday?)
please take a look as the meeting approaches. Otherwise, comments are
welcome, but I suggest you read it now only if you also plan on reading a later draft, as significantly more work will be done on it over the next
few days.

I've started a QuickTips summary of this and cool-uris. It is very direct
about endorsing HTTP URIs. Attached here for consideration.

Jonathan

On Apr 20, 2008, at 5:57 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote:

Some of you may have heard that the URI note has been revised since
the last public draft last October.  This is indeed the case, and its
authors are working on polishing the new version.  If you would like
to examine a snapshot of our work it is available here:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/notes/uris/

It's still in a state of high flux so we're can't promise to act on or
even respond to comments right now.  We plan to give you further
drafts
for review over the coming week and after.

Best
Jonathan





Reply via email to