Sorry for the confusion. My query was based on the following:
http://dbpedia.org/page/Category:Cerebrum
I pasted the wrong DBpedia page (http://dbpedia.org/page/Cerebrum).
However, Nigam brought up a important point that the design, creation,
and improvement of wikipedia's infoboxes may be guided by standard
ontologies.
Cheers,
-Kei
Peter Ansell wrote:
I think you want to take the Category bit out. The following works
SELECT ?brainregion WHERE {
?brainregion dbpedia2:ispartof
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cerebrum>
}
Cheers,
Peter
2008/7/15 Nigam Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Kei,
What I find odd is that the page http://dbpedia.org/page/Cerebrum, has a
property ispartof, but on the query page (http://dbpedia.org/snorql/) if I run:
SELECT ?brainregion WHERE {
?brainregion dbpedia2:ispartof
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Cerebrum>
}
// NOTE: PREFIX dbpedia2: <http://dbpedia.org/property/> is already defined //
I don't get any parts (only the query you sent, using the skos:subject gets the
parts). Having to query the skos:subject property to get parts is a bit
non-intuitive, esp when a ispartof property exists.
-Nigam.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:public-semweb-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kei Cheung
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 12:06 PM
To: Peter Ansell
Cc: Matthias Samwald; w3c semweb hcls
Subject: Re: 'Gene WIki' announced
Just want to use the brain as an example:
Wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerebrum
DBpedia page:
http://dbpedia.org/page/Cerebrum
SPARQL query through DPpedia's SNORQL interface:
http://dbpedia.org/snorql/?query=SELECT+%3Fbrainregion+WHERE+%7B%0D%0A++
%3Fbrainregion+skos%3Asubject+%0D%0A++++%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fre
source%2FCategory%3ACerebrum%3E%0D%0A%7D
Cheers,
-Kei
Peter Ansell wrote:
The edit link for that template page is on the proteins page, you just
have to know which one to click, above and right of the infobox. It
isn't obvious though!
Cheers,
Peter
2008/7/14 Matthias Samwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Oh, I see. The link to this other page should be mentioned in the
comments
of the original wiki page, since it is rather unlikely that a
researcher
that wants to quickly update the protein box has the motivation to
find out
how he can actually reach that other page.
~~ Matthias
The Protein Box Bot [1] inserts templates based on the geneid that
is
given to it, in particular for that page it inserts a template from
another page [2]. Editing that page customises the output that is
seen
in the infobox on that page. It should be relatively simple to take
the pages like [2] and retrieve semantic information from them.
Cheers,
Peter
[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:PBB&action=edit
[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:PBB/1605&action=edit
2008/7/14 Matthias Samwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It is not surprising that the protein/gene information is missing
from
DBpedia. Looking at
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dystroglycan&action=edit
it seems like this information is not held in the source of the
wiki
page.
Maybe someone with better knowledge about Mediawiki could explain
how
this
works and how the information could be harvested by DBpedia? I am
planning
to write a documentation for the DBpedia developers that could help
them
improve the representation of biomedical wiki entries in DBpedia
(such as
creating direct links to the URIs of Uniprot-RDF). This could also
be a
helpful addition.
Cheers,
Matthias Samwald
DERI Galway, Ireland // Semantic Web Company, Austria
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Ansell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "w3c semweb hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: 'Gene WIki' announced
When Francois Belleau was investigating integrating the infobox
information into Bio2RDF he found that the infoboxes were missing
in
the dbpedia database. Not sure if that changed since he last
checked.
It would be very valuable to have the information from infoboxes
and
the gene-wiki templates in dbpedia. Might need to do a custom
parser
for the gene-wiki templates if they aren't similar to infoboxes.
Cheers,
Peter
2008/7/14 Kei Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
According to http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Datasets#h18-11, DBpedia
contains
data
extracted from infoboxes (which should include gene/protein
infoboxes).
-Kei
Matthias Samwald wrote:
It seems like the protein/gene infoboxes are not reflected in
DBpedia,
since the information is not held in conventional infoboxes (as
far as
I
have understood).
Compare
http://dbpedia.org/page/Dystroglycan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dystroglycan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kei Cheung"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What about DBpedia (http://dbpedia.org)?
-Kei
