Matthias Samwald wrote:
I have also started to convert SIDER into aTags, but our two
conversions will be complementary. What I am doing is mapping the
information to the OBO disease ontology and to DBpedia (for drug
names), and reusing OBO and DBpedia URIs directly. The conversion will
be lossy when no matches are found in these resources, but it will be
bound more tightly to OBO and DBpedia.
The STITCH ids for chemicals seem to be equivalent to Pubchem in all
cases I checked. Are there deviations?
I wonder if there are any cross-references between STITCH and the TCM
dataset that Jun converted.
-Kei
