Actually, I'm fairly certain from interim, high level, reports, that
they do have a semweb solutions in mind, but for unknown reasons
modified the language in the final report.
?!
On 12/14/10 2:09 PM, Jim McCusker wrote:
2010/12/14 Matthias Löbe <matthias.lo...@imise.uni-leipzig.de
<mailto:matthias.lo...@imise.uni-leipzig.de>>
Hello to all,
A central point is to create an "Universal Exchange Language" that is
architecturally neutral, XML-based, extensible, optimized for
representing structured data, and that should have the ability to
include/ reference controlled vocabularies. That language would be
used to design fine-grained data elements that could be tagged with
metadata. These data elements should be modular, reusable, interlinked
and should not be tied to a specific context.
Like it or not, they were probably thinking of HL7 and ISO 21090. We
would need to show how semweb solutions are a better solution, or how
it is tied too much to healthcare, leaving out life sciences,
population science, chemistry, etc. We don't yet have *a* solution for
this, we have several. :-)
Jim
--
Jim McCusker
Programmer Analyst
Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics
Yale School of Medicine
james.mccus...@yale.edu <mailto:james.mccus...@yale.edu> | (203) 785-6330
http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu
PhD Student
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
mcc...@cs.rpi.edu <mailto:mcc...@cs.rpi.edu>
http://tw.rpi.edu
