Thanks for the link. Great to see you using VoID to describe the data. I'd argue for having a triple capturing the explicit version number of the DrugBank dataset using a triple like the following. My reason is that we encountered a lot of problems in Open PHACTS tracing what versions of datasets were being used when the only information we had to go on was the conversion date. <http://bio2rdf.org/bio2rdf_dataset:drugbank> <http://purl.org/pav/version> "3.0" .
I note that you describe both the RDF version of DrugBank and the original DrugBank data as a void:Dataset. My understanding of the class definition is that the dataset should be captured in RDF [1]. For this reason, in our Open PHACTS work we would tend to use the dctype:Dataset class to define the original DrugBank data [2]. Alasdair [1] http://vocab.deri.ie/void#Dataset [2] http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=dcmitype#Dataset On 12 Dec 2012, at 10:40, Michel Dumontier <michel.dumont...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > The parser works on the v3 XML files. We don't currently specify the source > dataset at that level of detail - here's the link to the provenance: > > http://download.bio2rdf.org/release/2/drugbank/bio2rdf-drugbank-20121008.nt > > m. > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Alasdair J G Gray <a.g...@cs.man.ac.uk> > wrote: > Is there a metadata description of the data set capturing this kind of > information? > > > > -- > Michel Dumontier > Associate Professor of Bioinformatics, Carleton University > Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest Group > http://dumontierlab.com > Dr Alasdair J G Gray Research Associate alasdair.g...@manchester.ac.uk +44 161 275 0145 http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~graya/ Please consider the environment before printing this email.
