Hi, how about 'isAtomicPartOf'?
Vladimir On 8 December 2014 at 18:04, Michel Dumontier <michel.dumont...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > On the call today we discussed the issue [1] of linking a symbol in > a triple (e.g. a subject, a predicate, *or* an object) to a dataset. > The use case for this is twofold : to provide a direct link between > data items and their datasets in a Linked Data manner, and to survey > the use of data items across datasets. While we agreed that using a > relation such as dc:isPartOf is fairly natural to link the triple > itself to the dataset, it is much less clear for linking the > components to the dataset. In Bio2RDF we used void:inDataset, but the > domain of this relation is a foaf:Document, so it muddies the > semantics by entailing a possible disjoint type with whatever the > subject has been typed with (e.g. protein, disease, etc). > > We discussed the suitability of existing vocabularies, but none, to > our knowledge, clearly fit the situation. For instance, can > dc:isPartOf (http://purl.org/dc/terms/isPartOf) be used as a logical > partition of the dataset with the data item? or is SIO's refers to > (http://semanticscience.org/resource/refers-to) potential suitable, if > not somewhat vague? > > We welcome your thoughts on the matter. Do you know of a suitable > relation? Should we consider some new relation such as utilizes / > is-utilized-in or is-data-item-in / has-data-item? > > Cheers! > > m. > > [1] https://github.com/joejimbo/HCLSDatasetDescriptions/issues/90 > > Michel Dumontier > Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford > University > Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest > Group > http://dumontierlab.com > >