Unless there are significant objections, I don't see why not. I think
it's sufficiently close to SPARQL to count as "SPARQL-dev"
Andy
-------- Original Message --------
> From: Richard Newman <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 9 March 2007 16:47
>
> I like the look of this.
>
> Is this the appropriate forum for discussions, Andy? (Presumably I'll
> have *something* to say when I study it in detail!)
>
> Thanks,
>
> -R
>
>
> On 9 Mar 2007, at 5:29 AM, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>
> >
> > A proposal for a SPARQL/Update language:
> >
> > http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/SPARQL-Update.html
> >
> > Andy
