On 09/03/07, Richard Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like the look of this.
Ditto.
Is this the appropriate forum for discussions, Andy?
Some already on Planet RDF - Richard C. beat me to it: http://dowhatimean.net/2007/03/sparul%e2%80%94sparql-update-language Key concern there - [[ Max Völkel and I did a very rough proposal for a similar language back last year. We received some criticism over this: Tunneling application protocols over HTTP is not an optimal use of the web. Case in point: the WS-* stack. I tried to work out the issues by asking how RESTful SQL would look like, a potentially illuminating analogy. I found the results inconclusive—I understand the concerns raised by REST proponents, but haven't seen a better alternative. The main question, I think, is one of scope: Is SPARQL Update intended as an SQL-like language that applications use to communicate with their local or nearby data store? Or is it intended as public web infrastructure, similar to Web 2.0 APIs and HTTP PUT? ]] (Presumably I'll
have *something* to say when I study it in detail!)
Ditto. My first impressions (the only bit that would perhaps have been worth bringing over here is subsumed by Richard's comment above): http://dannyayers.com/2007/03/09/sparql-update
Thanks,
Ditto, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
