Andy,
Is this actually true? See the SPARQL Tests section of the table,
which defines a match for two RDF terms. (Of course, they're not
RDFterm-equal, so it produces a type error anyway.)
-R
On 6 Jul 2008, at 11:07 AM, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
Not trickier - uses a different part of the spec :-)
See sec 11 operator dispatch table.
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#OperatorMapping
Under (minimal) SPARQL,
= (value"^^xsd:string , "value" )
has no entry in that table. So it's a type error and the FILTER is
false.
