has no entry in that table. So it's a type error and the FILTER is
false.
Is this actually true? See the SPARQL Tests section of the table,
which defines a match for two RDF terms. (Of course, they're not
RDFterm-equal, so it produces a type error anyway.)
The dispatch to RDFTerm-equals is the place the type error is
produced; it's a catch-all and as such must be last in the table.
Yes, that's how I understood it -- I just didn't think that "RDFterm-
equals throws a type error" was the same thing as "has no entry in
that table", because there doesn't seem to be anything in the document
that says that the bottom 5 rows are qualitatively different to the
others.
Thanks for clarifying.
