On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:30:09 -0000, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-selectors-api-20060525/#issues
We smiled at "It would be nice if extensibility was addressed by DOM
Level 3 Core or a separate specification that all DOM specifications
could reuse."
http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#extensions
Yes indeed that would be a good thing. Because right now it makes
difficult to make a conformant DOM Level 3 Core implementations which
includes Selectors API.
http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/introduction.html#ID-Conformance
which might be incompatible with.
[[[Objects implementing the Document interface defined in DOM Level 3
Core must also implement the DocumentSelector interface [DOM3Core].]]]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-selectors-api-20060525/#documentselector
Testing and analysing conformance dependencies will be a good thing.
So given that we don't want to depend too much on DOM Level 3 Core being
updated I changed it to the following based on group discussion:
Extensions of the APIs defined in this specification
are strongly discouraged. User Agents, Working Groups
and other interested parties should discuss extensions
on a relevant public forum, such as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it's the best we can do.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>