On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:30:09 -0000, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-selectors-api-20060525/#issues

We smiled at "It would be nice if extensibility was addressed by DOM Level 3 Core or a separate specification that all DOM specifications could reuse."
                http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#extensions

Yes indeed that would be a good thing. Because right now it makes difficult to make a conformant DOM Level 3 Core implementations which includes Selectors API.
        http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/introduction.html#ID-Conformance

        which might be incompatible with.
        
[[[Objects implementing the Document interface defined in DOM Level 3 Core must also implement the DocumentSelector interface [DOM3Core].]]]
        http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-selectors-api-20060525/#documentselector
        
        Testing and analysing conformance dependencies will be a good thing.

So given that we don't want to depend too much on DOM Level 3 Core being updated I changed it to the following based on group discussion:

   Extensions of the APIs defined in this specification
   are strongly discouraged. User Agents, Working Groups
   and other interested parties should discuss extensions
   on a relevant public forum, such as
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I think it's the best we can do.


--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>


Reply via email to