Hi Anne,
Le 19 sept. 06 à 19:56, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:30:09 -0000, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-selectors-api-20060525/#issues
We smiled at "It would be nice if extensibility was addressed by
DOM Level 3 Core or a separate specification that all DOM
specifications could reuse."
http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#extensions
Yes indeed that would be a good thing. Because right now it makes
difficult to make a conformant DOM Level 3 Core implementations
which includes Selectors API.
http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/introduction.html#ID-
Conformance
which might be incompatible with.
[[[Objects implementing the Document interface defined in DOM
Level 3 Core must also implement the DocumentSelector interface
[DOM3Core].]]]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-selectors-api-20060525/
#documentselector
Testing and analysing conformance dependencies will be a good thing.
So given that we don't want to depend too much on DOM Level 3 Core
being updated I changed it to the following based on group discussion:
Extensions of the APIs defined in this specification
are strongly discouraged. User Agents, Working Groups
and other interested parties should discuss extensions
on a relevant public forum, such as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it's the best we can do.
Is it compatible with
[[[
Extensibility
Extensions to the DocumentSelector interface are reserved for future
work by the Web APIs WG. WGs besides the Web APIs WG may extend the
interface, but must coordinate that with the Web APIs WG. UAs may
extend the interface, but must prefix the new members using a string
specific to the vendor following the VendorMember scheme. (Normally
members follow the member scheme.) FooSetDefaultNamespace(ns) would
be an example for company Foo.
Authors may use extension mechanisms specific to the host language,
like .prototype in ECMAScript.
]]] -- Selectors API
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-selectors-api-20060525/
#extensibility
Wed, 24 May 2006 16:20:19 GMT
I agree with your sentence, but please be sure to have the same prose
in both sections or to refer to extensibility section.
Thanks.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
